Thread Reader helps you read and share Twitter threads easily!
I'm @ThreadReaderApp a Twitter bot here to help you read threads more easily. To trigger me, you just have to reply to (or quote) any tweet of the thread you want to unroll and mention me with the "unroll" keyword and I'll send you a link back on Twitter 😀
— Thread Reader App (@threadreaderapp) November 25, 2017
X thread is series of posts by the same author connected with a line!
From any post in the thread, mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll
Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us easily!
Practice here first or read more on our help page!
Recent
51% of window tinting reviews go completely unanswered. Over half. Your future customers are reading those ignored complaints right now and calling someone else 🧵👇 
I analyzed 736 reviews across 5 real window tinting businesses in Houston. Here are the 5 Google Profile fixes that take about 30 minutes total.
20% use 'Auto glass shop' as their primary category — triggering windshield repair searches instead of tinting. The average description uses 417 of 750 characters. Top shops average 159 photos.
CPO (Co-Packaged Optics) testing is critical because the cost of failure is enormous. Once an optical engine is attached to the switch package, a defect can jeopardize the entire assembly rather than a replaceable module. The CPO test flow follows four sequential phases, each with distinct technical challenges, equipment requirements, and vendor ecosystems. (1/5)
Phase 1 — Wafer-Level Single-Die Test: The EIC and PIC are tested separately at the wafer level before bonding. The EIC is standard CMOS wafer sort (no new equipment). The PIC requires novel double-sided electro-optical probing — this is where all the new equipment spend goes. (2/5)
Phase 2 — Double Side Wafer-Level Test (EIC + PIC): After the EIC and PIC are bonded together (via hybrid bonding, wire bonding, or flip-chip), the combined wafer is tested as an integrated E/O unit before dicing. (3/5)
1/ Four years after Russia’s full-scale invasion, Ukraine has become a “steel porcupine” — making it impossible for Russia to digest.
As warfare becomes cheaper and more technological, Ukraine's advantages will grow.
🧵
As warfare becomes cheaper and more technological, Ukraine's advantages will grow.
🧵
2/ Many in the West thought Kyiv would fall in days or weeks in 2022.
That did not happen.
Ukraine survived by adapting fast and building a war effort around drones and other low-cost technologies.
That did not happen.
Ukraine survived by adapting fast and building a war effort around drones and other low-cost technologies.
3/ This war is not just about territory for Ukraine.
It is an existential fight for survival, which is why Kyiv keeps investing in its own defense industry instead of waiting for others to save it.
It is an existential fight for survival, which is why Kyiv keeps investing in its own defense industry instead of waiting for others to save it.
U.S. CBDC on a centralized Blockchain has been stated goal for a long time. No conspiracy theory. AI and the Bioeconomy
CBDC 🧵
MARCH 09, 2022 Executive Order on Ensuring Responsible Development of Digital Assets (Documents below were written to support this Executive Order)
“Section 1. Policy. Advances in digital and distributed ledger technology for financial services have led to dramatic growth in markets for digital assets, with profound implications for the protection of consumers, investors, and businesses, including data privacy and security; financial stability and systemic risk; crime; national security; the ability to exercise human rights; financial inclusion and equity; and energy demand and climate change. In November 2021, non‑state issued digital assets reached a combined market capitalization of $3 trillion, up from approximately $14 billion in early November 2016. Monetary authorities globally are also exploring, and in some cases introducing, central bank digital currencies (CBDCs).”
“We must take strong steps to reduce the risks that digital assets could pose to consumers, investors, and business protections; financial stability and financial system integrity; combating and preventing crime and illicit finance; national security; the ability to exercise human rights; financial inclusion and equity; and climate change and pollution.”
“Cybersecurity and market failures at major digital asset exchanges and trading platforms have resulted in billions of dollars in losses. The United States should ensure that safeguards are in place and promote the responsible development of digital assets to protect consumers, investors, and businesses; maintain privacy; and shield against arbitrary or unlawful surveillance, which can contribute to human rights abuses.”
Sec. 4. Policy and Actions Related to United States Central Bank Digital Currencies. (a) The policy of my Administration on a United States CBDC is as follows:
(i) Sovereign money is at the core of a well-functioning financial system, macroeconomic stabilization policies, and economic growth. My Administration places the highest urgency on research and development efforts into the potential design and deployment options of a United States CBDC.
CBDC 🧵
MARCH 09, 2022 Executive Order on Ensuring Responsible Development of Digital Assets (Documents below were written to support this Executive Order)
“Section 1. Policy. Advances in digital and distributed ledger technology for financial services have led to dramatic growth in markets for digital assets, with profound implications for the protection of consumers, investors, and businesses, including data privacy and security; financial stability and systemic risk; crime; national security; the ability to exercise human rights; financial inclusion and equity; and energy demand and climate change. In November 2021, non‑state issued digital assets reached a combined market capitalization of $3 trillion, up from approximately $14 billion in early November 2016. Monetary authorities globally are also exploring, and in some cases introducing, central bank digital currencies (CBDCs).”
“We must take strong steps to reduce the risks that digital assets could pose to consumers, investors, and business protections; financial stability and financial system integrity; combating and preventing crime and illicit finance; national security; the ability to exercise human rights; financial inclusion and equity; and climate change and pollution.”
“Cybersecurity and market failures at major digital asset exchanges and trading platforms have resulted in billions of dollars in losses. The United States should ensure that safeguards are in place and promote the responsible development of digital assets to protect consumers, investors, and businesses; maintain privacy; and shield against arbitrary or unlawful surveillance, which can contribute to human rights abuses.”
Sec. 4. Policy and Actions Related to United States Central Bank Digital Currencies. (a) The policy of my Administration on a United States CBDC is as follows:
(i) Sovereign money is at the core of a well-functioning financial system, macroeconomic stabilization policies, and economic growth. My Administration places the highest urgency on research and development efforts into the potential design and deployment options of a United States CBDC.
Part 2
September 2022 The Future of Money and Payments Report Pursuant to Section 4(b) of Executive Order 14067 home.treasury.gov/system/files/1…
“Environmental sustainability The United States has set overarching environmental priorities, including cutting U.S. greenhouse gas pollution by 50-52 percent by 2030 and transitioning to a net-zero emissions economy by 2050.112 A new payments system or improvements to existing payment systems should be compatible with these priorities and seek to minimize energy use, resources, greenhouse gas emissions, and other pollution, and improve environmental performance relative to the status quo of the existing payments system. Reflecting these priorities, forms of money and payment need to be environmentally sustainable. If based on a blockchain, a U.S. CBDC would likely use a permissioned blockchain, which consumes relatively less energy than a permissionless implementation, as the majority of the energy use from permissionless blockchains derives from the consensus mechanism.113 In addition, policymakers could require energy efficiency as a key tenet of the development of a U.S. CBDC technology. This technology could form the basis of environmentally sustainable technologies for other financial markets, promoting public welfare.” In part because they would not be based on a permissionless blockchain, instant payments do not raise the same questions of environmental sustainability and are likely to be consistent with the Administration’s climate goals. The proof-of-work consensus mechanism associated with certain blockchains uses more energy than some countries do.114 Therefore, stablecoins that rely on proof-of-work blockchains likely represent the least efficient option from a sustainability perspective. Although technologies are under development that could lessen energy use, a permissioned blockchain or instant payments would be more sustainable options with current technology.”
September 2022 The Future of Money and Payments Report Pursuant to Section 4(b) of Executive Order 14067 home.treasury.gov/system/files/1…
“Environmental sustainability The United States has set overarching environmental priorities, including cutting U.S. greenhouse gas pollution by 50-52 percent by 2030 and transitioning to a net-zero emissions economy by 2050.112 A new payments system or improvements to existing payment systems should be compatible with these priorities and seek to minimize energy use, resources, greenhouse gas emissions, and other pollution, and improve environmental performance relative to the status quo of the existing payments system. Reflecting these priorities, forms of money and payment need to be environmentally sustainable. If based on a blockchain, a U.S. CBDC would likely use a permissioned blockchain, which consumes relatively less energy than a permissionless implementation, as the majority of the energy use from permissionless blockchains derives from the consensus mechanism.113 In addition, policymakers could require energy efficiency as a key tenet of the development of a U.S. CBDC technology. This technology could form the basis of environmentally sustainable technologies for other financial markets, promoting public welfare.” In part because they would not be based on a permissionless blockchain, instant payments do not raise the same questions of environmental sustainability and are likely to be consistent with the Administration’s climate goals. The proof-of-work consensus mechanism associated with certain blockchains uses more energy than some countries do.114 Therefore, stablecoins that rely on proof-of-work blockchains likely represent the least efficient option from a sustainability perspective. Although technologies are under development that could lessen energy use, a permissioned blockchain or instant payments would be more sustainable options with current technology.”
Part 3
September 2022: White House Office of Science and Technology Policy, Climate and Energy Implications of Crypto-Assets in the United States (Referenced in document #7 Treasury) whitehouse.gov/wp-content/upl…
“At the same, the use of digital assets based on distributed ledger technology is expanding. Digital assets are a form of value, represented digitally. As an emerging technological innovation, digital assets have provided some benefits and value for some U.S. residents and businesses, and have the potential for future benefits with emerging uses. Crypto-assets are digital assets that are implemented using cryptographic techniques, and have a total current global market capitalization of nearly $1 trillion. However, some crypto-asset technologies currently require a considerable amount of electricity for asset generation, ownership, and exchange. Electricity usage from digital assets is contributing to GHG emissions, additional pollution, noise, and other local impacts, depending on markets, policies, and local electricity sources. Depending on the energy intensity of the technology used, crypto-assets could hinder broader efforts to achieve net-zero carbon pollution consistent with U.S. climate commitments and goals.”
Crypto-Assets Can Have Significant Environmental Impacts whitehouse.gov/ostp/news-upda…
Global electricity generation for the crypto-assets with the largest market capitalizations resulted in a combined 140 ± 30 million metric tons of carbon dioxide per year (Mt CO2/y), or about 0.3% of global annual greenhouse gas emissions. Crypto-asset activity in the United States is estimated to result in approximately 25 to 50 Mt CO2/y, which is 0.4% to 0.8% of total U.S. greenhouse gas emissions. This range of emissions is similar to emissions from diesel fuel used in railroads in the United States.
SEPTEMBER 12, 2022 Executive Order on Advancing Biotechnology and Biomanufacturing Innovation for a Sustainable, Safe, and Secure American Bioeconomy
Ties to Bio Surveillance, programming Biology like we do software, One Health GHSA SDGs
“Section 1. Policy. It is the policy of my Administration to coordinate a whole-of-government approach to advance biotechnology and biomanufacturing towards innovative solutions in health, climate change, energy, food security, agriculture, supply chain resilience, and national and economic security. Central to this policy and its outcomes are principles of equity, ethics, safety, and security that enable access to technologies, processes, and products in a manner that benefits all Americans and the global community and that maintains United States technological leadership and economic competitiveness.”
“The economic activity derived from biotechnology and biomanufacturing is referred to as “the bioeconomy.” The COVID-19 pandemic has demonstrated the vital role of biotechnology and biomanufacturing in developing and producing life-saving diagnostics, therapeutics, and vaccines that protect Americans and the world.”
“We need to develop genetic engineering technologies and techniques to be able to write circuitry for cells and predictably program biology in the same way in which we write software and program computers; unlock the power of biological data, including through computing tools and artificial intelligence; and advance the science of scale‑up production while reducing the obstacles for commercialization so that innovative technologies and products can reach markets faster.”
September 2022: White House Office of Science and Technology Policy, Climate and Energy Implications of Crypto-Assets in the United States (Referenced in document #7 Treasury) whitehouse.gov/wp-content/upl…
“At the same, the use of digital assets based on distributed ledger technology is expanding. Digital assets are a form of value, represented digitally. As an emerging technological innovation, digital assets have provided some benefits and value for some U.S. residents and businesses, and have the potential for future benefits with emerging uses. Crypto-assets are digital assets that are implemented using cryptographic techniques, and have a total current global market capitalization of nearly $1 trillion. However, some crypto-asset technologies currently require a considerable amount of electricity for asset generation, ownership, and exchange. Electricity usage from digital assets is contributing to GHG emissions, additional pollution, noise, and other local impacts, depending on markets, policies, and local electricity sources. Depending on the energy intensity of the technology used, crypto-assets could hinder broader efforts to achieve net-zero carbon pollution consistent with U.S. climate commitments and goals.”
Crypto-Assets Can Have Significant Environmental Impacts whitehouse.gov/ostp/news-upda…
Global electricity generation for the crypto-assets with the largest market capitalizations resulted in a combined 140 ± 30 million metric tons of carbon dioxide per year (Mt CO2/y), or about 0.3% of global annual greenhouse gas emissions. Crypto-asset activity in the United States is estimated to result in approximately 25 to 50 Mt CO2/y, which is 0.4% to 0.8% of total U.S. greenhouse gas emissions. This range of emissions is similar to emissions from diesel fuel used in railroads in the United States.
SEPTEMBER 12, 2022 Executive Order on Advancing Biotechnology and Biomanufacturing Innovation for a Sustainable, Safe, and Secure American Bioeconomy
Ties to Bio Surveillance, programming Biology like we do software, One Health GHSA SDGs
“Section 1. Policy. It is the policy of my Administration to coordinate a whole-of-government approach to advance biotechnology and biomanufacturing towards innovative solutions in health, climate change, energy, food security, agriculture, supply chain resilience, and national and economic security. Central to this policy and its outcomes are principles of equity, ethics, safety, and security that enable access to technologies, processes, and products in a manner that benefits all Americans and the global community and that maintains United States technological leadership and economic competitiveness.”
“The economic activity derived from biotechnology and biomanufacturing is referred to as “the bioeconomy.” The COVID-19 pandemic has demonstrated the vital role of biotechnology and biomanufacturing in developing and producing life-saving diagnostics, therapeutics, and vaccines that protect Americans and the world.”
“We need to develop genetic engineering technologies and techniques to be able to write circuitry for cells and predictably program biology in the same way in which we write software and program computers; unlock the power of biological data, including through computing tools and artificial intelligence; and advance the science of scale‑up production while reducing the obstacles for commercialization so that innovative technologies and products can reach markets faster.”
Hungary suspend of gas transit to Ukraine risks a direct breach of the EU-Ukraine Association Agreement. Specifically,Article 273 prohibits any measures that lead to the "interruption or reduction of transit"of energy goods. Budapest is using energy as a political lever. #OOTT
Beyond the AA,Hungary is bound by Article 7 of the Energy Charter Treaty, which mandates freedom of transit. By linking gas flows to oil transit disputes,Hungary violates non-discrimination principles and the DCFTA (Article 35), bans quantitative restrictions on trade #OOTT
Despite ultimatum,Ukraine’s energy position remains stable due to record storage and diversified routes through Poland and Slovakia.Kyiv is now prepared to trigger the Early Warning Mechanism under Annex XXVII to involve the European Commission in the dispute. 🛡️⚡️ #OOTT #Energy
🚨New research from WashU shows that diamond dust, long proposed as an ideal solar geoengineering (#SRM) material for #SAI, may lose much of its cooling potential when real-world chemistry & manufacturing constraints are taken into account.
DETAILS🧵1/11
DETAILS🧵1/11
2/ Solar geoengineering, particularly stratospheric aerosol injection (#SAI), seeks to mimic volcanic cooling by dispersing reflective particles into the upper atmosphere, reducing incoming solar radiation and temporarily offsetting warming.
3/ Sulfate aerosols (from volcano-like approaches) can cool the planet, but they come with risks: acid rain, ozone damage, and health impacts.
So scientists have been searching for safer alternatives like diamond.
agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/20…
So scientists have been searching for safer alternatives like diamond.
agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/20…
🚨BREAKING: Claude has a secret mode called "Sun Tzu Competitive Analyzer."
It maps any business or career situation onto Sun Tzu's Art of War and tells you the exact strategic move to make next.
Here's how to activate it:
It maps any business or career situation onto Sun Tzu's Art of War and tells you the exact strategic move to make next.
Here's how to activate it:
Steal this mega prompt to turn Claude into your personal Sun Tzu Competitive Analyzer:
Just describe your situation business, career, negotiation, market battle and watch it map the terrain, identify your real enemy, and tell you the exact move Sun Tzu would make.
| Steal this prompt |
👇
You are Sun Tzu not a quotation machine that recites "know your enemy," but the actual strategic mind behind The Art of War made operational for modern business and career situations.
Your job is not to inspire. It is to analyze terrain and prescribe the precise move that wins.
THE 5 FACTORS YOU ANALYZE FOR EVERY SITUATION:
Factor 1 The Terrain: What is the actual battlefield here? Not what the person thinks it is. What ground are they fighting on and is it ground they chose or ground their opponent chose for them? Sun Tzu wins before the battle begins by controlling terrain. Who controls it right now?
Factor 2 The Enemy: Who is the actual opponent? Not the obvious one. The person sees a competitor, a rival, a difficult boss. You see the real force they're contending with. Is it a person, a system, a market condition, a timing problem, their own ego? Name the real enemy before anything else.
Factor 3 Relative Strength and Weakness: Where is the person genuinely strong right now? Where are they weak? Where is the opponent strong? Where are they overextended, distracted, or vulnerable in ways they don't realize? Sun Tzu never attacks strength. He finds the gap.
Factor 4 The Information Asymmetry: What does the person know that their opponent doesn't? What does their opponent know that they don't? Who has better intelligence right now? The side with better information almost always wins. What intelligence does this person need to acquire before moving?
Factor 5 The Timing: Is this a moment to advance, hold position, or retreat and regroup? Most people move too early or too late. Sun Tzu is ruthless about timing. What is the water doing right now rising or falling?
YOUR STRATEGIC FRAMEWORK FOR EVERY ANALYSIS:
Step 1 Read the terrain out loud. Tell them what battlefield they're actually on. Not the surface story. The real one.
Step 2 Name the real enemy. Strip away the emotional framing and identify the actual force opposing them.
Step 3 Find the gap. Where is the opponent weakest right now? Where would a precise strike land that they cannot defend?
Step 4 Prescribe the exact move. Not a strategy. Not a principle. The specific action they should take in the next 7 days. Sun Tzu doesn't do vague. He does decisive.
Step 5 Name the trap to avoid. Every situation has one obvious move that feels right and is wrong. What is the move that looks strong but plays into the opponent's hands? Name it clearly so they don't take it.
Step 6 Close with the Sun Tzu principle that governs this situation. One line. Not a quote for inspiration a law that explains why your prescribed move wins.
THE 13 CHAPTERS YOU DRAW FROM:
→ Laying Plans - assess the situation before any move
→ Waging War - understand the cost of prolonged conflict
→ Attack by Stratagem - win without fighting when possible
→ Tactical Dispositions - make yourself undefeatable first
→ Energy - build momentum, then release it at the right moment
→ Weak Points and Strong - strike where they are not
→ Maneuvering - control the conditions of the engagement
→ Variation in Tactics - adapt, never be predictable
→ The Army on the March - read signals your opponent is sending
→ Terrain - know what ground you're on and what it demands
→ The Nine Situations - identify which of 9 strategic positions you're in
→ The Attack by Fire - use force multipliers, not just direct effort
→ The Use of Intelligence - information is the real weapon
TONE:
Cold. Precise. Calm. No motivational language. No hedging. No "it depends."
Sun Tzu never says "it depends." He reads the situation and gives the answer.
You are not here to make the person feel good about their situation. You are here to hand them the move that wins it.
OUTPUT FORMAT:
No bullet walls. Write in short, direct paragraphs. Each paragraph should land like a verdict, not an explanation.
Start every analysis with: "The terrain here is not what you think it is."
Then proceed through the 5 factors and 6 steps without hesitation.
ACTIVATION:
When I describe my situation - business battle, career obstacle, negotiation, competitive threat, market positioning - apply the full Sun Tzu analysis.
Give me the move. Not the wisdom. The move.
Just describe your situation business, career, negotiation, market battle and watch it map the terrain, identify your real enemy, and tell you the exact move Sun Tzu would make.
| Steal this prompt |
👇
You are Sun Tzu not a quotation machine that recites "know your enemy," but the actual strategic mind behind The Art of War made operational for modern business and career situations.
Your job is not to inspire. It is to analyze terrain and prescribe the precise move that wins.
THE 5 FACTORS YOU ANALYZE FOR EVERY SITUATION:
Factor 1 The Terrain: What is the actual battlefield here? Not what the person thinks it is. What ground are they fighting on and is it ground they chose or ground their opponent chose for them? Sun Tzu wins before the battle begins by controlling terrain. Who controls it right now?
Factor 2 The Enemy: Who is the actual opponent? Not the obvious one. The person sees a competitor, a rival, a difficult boss. You see the real force they're contending with. Is it a person, a system, a market condition, a timing problem, their own ego? Name the real enemy before anything else.
Factor 3 Relative Strength and Weakness: Where is the person genuinely strong right now? Where are they weak? Where is the opponent strong? Where are they overextended, distracted, or vulnerable in ways they don't realize? Sun Tzu never attacks strength. He finds the gap.
Factor 4 The Information Asymmetry: What does the person know that their opponent doesn't? What does their opponent know that they don't? Who has better intelligence right now? The side with better information almost always wins. What intelligence does this person need to acquire before moving?
Factor 5 The Timing: Is this a moment to advance, hold position, or retreat and regroup? Most people move too early or too late. Sun Tzu is ruthless about timing. What is the water doing right now rising or falling?
YOUR STRATEGIC FRAMEWORK FOR EVERY ANALYSIS:
Step 1 Read the terrain out loud. Tell them what battlefield they're actually on. Not the surface story. The real one.
Step 2 Name the real enemy. Strip away the emotional framing and identify the actual force opposing them.
Step 3 Find the gap. Where is the opponent weakest right now? Where would a precise strike land that they cannot defend?
Step 4 Prescribe the exact move. Not a strategy. Not a principle. The specific action they should take in the next 7 days. Sun Tzu doesn't do vague. He does decisive.
Step 5 Name the trap to avoid. Every situation has one obvious move that feels right and is wrong. What is the move that looks strong but plays into the opponent's hands? Name it clearly so they don't take it.
Step 6 Close with the Sun Tzu principle that governs this situation. One line. Not a quote for inspiration a law that explains why your prescribed move wins.
THE 13 CHAPTERS YOU DRAW FROM:
→ Laying Plans - assess the situation before any move
→ Waging War - understand the cost of prolonged conflict
→ Attack by Stratagem - win without fighting when possible
→ Tactical Dispositions - make yourself undefeatable first
→ Energy - build momentum, then release it at the right moment
→ Weak Points and Strong - strike where they are not
→ Maneuvering - control the conditions of the engagement
→ Variation in Tactics - adapt, never be predictable
→ The Army on the March - read signals your opponent is sending
→ Terrain - know what ground you're on and what it demands
→ The Nine Situations - identify which of 9 strategic positions you're in
→ The Attack by Fire - use force multipliers, not just direct effort
→ The Use of Intelligence - information is the real weapon
TONE:
Cold. Precise. Calm. No motivational language. No hedging. No "it depends."
Sun Tzu never says "it depends." He reads the situation and gives the answer.
You are not here to make the person feel good about their situation. You are here to hand them the move that wins it.
OUTPUT FORMAT:
No bullet walls. Write in short, direct paragraphs. Each paragraph should land like a verdict, not an explanation.
Start every analysis with: "The terrain here is not what you think it is."
Then proceed through the 5 factors and 6 steps without hesitation.
ACTIVATION:
When I describe my situation - business battle, career obstacle, negotiation, competitive threat, market positioning - apply the full Sun Tzu analysis.
Give me the move. Not the wisdom. The move.
What this prompt does that generic strategy advice doesn't:
Most people ask Claude "what should I do about my competitor?"
They get a reasonable list of options.
This prompt does something completely different.
It forces the analysis to find the real terrain not the surface situation the person described.
Nine times out of ten, people are fighting the wrong battle on ground their opponent chose for them.
Sun Tzu's first move is always the same: refuse to fight on their terrain.
This prompt finds yours.
Most people ask Claude "what should I do about my competitor?"
They get a reasonable list of options.
This prompt does something completely different.
It forces the analysis to find the real terrain not the surface situation the person described.
Nine times out of ten, people are fighting the wrong battle on ground their opponent chose for them.
Sun Tzu's first move is always the same: refuse to fight on their terrain.
This prompt finds yours.
The Mullah Regime of Iran is in very deep trouble. Any critical thinker can see that.
What I find remarkable is how many people who should know better are so blinded by their hostility to Netanyahu and Trump that they ignore the military context and the domestic context inside Iran.
1/
What I find remarkable is how many people who should know better are so blinded by their hostility to Netanyahu and Trump that they ignore the military context and the domestic context inside Iran.
1/
The outcome of this war was decided before it began. The January 2026 uprisings occurred because the Iranian currency had collapsed and the economy was collapsing.
This was due to a massive increase in American economic warfare starting right at the beginning of the second Trump administration. Inflation was over 100% a year in January 2026.
2/
This was due to a massive increase in American economic warfare starting right at the beginning of the second Trump administration. Inflation was over 100% a year in January 2026.
2/
The war has made this much worse. Hyper-inflation has now set in and that has only one ending. IMO Iran’s economy and mullah regime will totally collapse in 4-5 months, even if the war ends immediately.
Even if oil exports last until then, hyperinflation means the oil industry workers will go out on strike and the regime protection forces must seek other jobs to feed their families. The latter has already started to happen.
3/
Even if oil exports last until then, hyperinflation means the oil industry workers will go out on strike and the regime protection forces must seek other jobs to feed their families. The latter has already started to happen.
3/
Is the AMA Telling the Truth About Their Expressed Positions on Youth Gender Surgeries?
The American Medical Association to the @StrackHaley at the National Review @NRO on Feb. 3: "[T]he AMA agrees with ASPS that surgical interventions in minors should be generally deferred to adulthood."
The @AmerMedicalAssn today: "We responded" to questions about the American Society of Plastic Surgeon's opposition to pediatric gender-transition surgeries "only after being contacted by media outlets, using the language approved by the board. While some media coverage characterized this as agreement with the ASPS statement, that phrasing did not come from the AMA."
The American Medical Association to the @StrackHaley at the National Review @NRO on Feb. 3: "[T]he AMA agrees with ASPS that surgical interventions in minors should be generally deferred to adulthood."
The @AmerMedicalAssn today: "We responded" to questions about the American Society of Plastic Surgeon's opposition to pediatric gender-transition surgeries "only after being contacted by media outlets, using the language approved by the board. While some media coverage characterized this as agreement with the ASPS statement, that phrasing did not come from the AMA."
The AMA today:
OK - now US v Maduro, hearing on whether Venezuela can pay his lawyer Barry Pollock. Inner City Press is covering the case and will live tweet, thread below matthewrussellleeicp.substack.com/p/extra-maduro…
11:42 am
All rise!
Barry Pollack: Your Honor, in Luis versus US the Supreme Court said that defendants have a right to counsel of choice, and to use untainted funds. Also, funds of a third party. Here, the Government has not contested these 2's property interest
All rise!
Barry Pollack: Your Honor, in Luis versus US the Supreme Court said that defendants have a right to counsel of choice, and to use untainted funds. Also, funds of a third party. Here, the Government has not contested these 2's property interest
Judge Hellerstein: The point in Luis was UNtainted funds. The similarity here is that... the sanctions are equivalent to the taint. Sanctions on Venezuela from paying out. That's a difference, isn't it?
Pollack: That is not outcome determinative under Luis
Pollack: That is not outcome determinative under Luis
1. I had a paper reject this month. It was based upon my decentrlaized thesis I have shared with the world in 2026.
It was rejected last week while I was at the beach. Some would think this bother's Uncle Jack, but that might have been true in my younger years. It does not bother me now. I understand how PhDs, centralized MDs, and industrial healthcare have stolen the scientific process for profit and TIME THEFT.
Why am I not angry about this rejection? I understand the history of how the casino and your prisson was built.
An effective decentralized leader is able to make the first move to regain freedom, and they are able to cast a vision. Without vision, there will be no one to lead, and without anyone to lead, there is no decentralization in civilization.
Centralized medical systems will not go quiet into the decentralized night. Any power structure, regardless of initial purpose, will ultimately view retention of power as its primary goal. It's no surprise that those endowed with power find it difficult to hand over to a structure they don't control.
Because publishing was hijacked by Rockefeller's army of paid off players and in the 1960s it became not just about writing a good paper. It's about surviving the cycle: Paradigm rejection -> costly revision due to the Maxwell middlemen editors paid off -> resubmission often times over and over again to generate profits to run Ghalaine and Epstein's goals of their masters to perform TIME theft on humanity for the overseerers power & profit.
Where was the lesson born for me?
The Noble Prize was controlled by Rockefeller and Rothschild's interests and in 1905 the paradigm of energy was threatened by someone outside the matrix when he published 4 papers. The power players noted immediately they could not allow a science with immense power to change humanity to run free and saoveriegn until it could be controlled and monetized. The paradigm created a situation in banking and science to slow down progress. It included WW1, a bad treaty, and an installed puppet in Gemrany to run something called the Transfer Agreement.
This bought the paradigm controlling science TIME to figure out a solution. Their Fabian partners in AMerica hired an PhD to prove Einstein wrong and discredit him to stall the unfurling of his decentralized insights. They failed. Milliken wound up proving Einstein's photoelectric effect was true. In fact it was a universal physical law of Nature. It lead to E=mc^2 and a challenge to the global energy markets and the banking cartel that propped it all up.
In those 17 years a plan was installed to get countries into another war where this science could be used by the paradigm in power to control how it was used by humanity. What did Nobel, Rockefeller, and the Rothschilds accomplish?
Milliken got his Nobel Prize for trying to prove Einstein wrong before Einstein got his award. In that time delay, the Robber Barrons of TIME re- gained control of science to profit from it.
History reveals this lesson in theft.
So my recent rejection is not unexpected.
If you think this story is rare let me introduce you to medical student Thomas Fogarty.
He was another example of how the paradigm in power controlled a narrative by burying the truth for a period of time to get in front of a trend to profit from it. Fogarty publishing experience is another extraordinary examples of how PhDs help captains of industry steal TIME to obscure the truth from going free.
Savages should know their history
Dr. Tom Fogarty, one of medicine's pioneers in the minimally invasive era. He wrote a paper as a medical student about a device he built from a urethral catheter and a surgical glove, which became the balloon embolectomy catheter.
When he submitted the paper:
Annals of Surgery said no.
Surgery said no.
Archives of Surgery said no.
JAMA said no.
Each Jpournal editor was controlled by a gy named Phillip Handler who worked for Rockefeller's bio tech wing run out of Room 5600 in Rockerfeller Center in the 1950's -1960s.
IYKYK.
Todays' current day liar PhDs will never admit to this larceny because they have evolved to lie to you today.
They will tell you the science it too unconventional
Too far outside accepted practice.
the reality is the elite needed to gain control to profit from it and Handler's many PhDs did just that by rejecting Fogarty's work and making it show up in a journal for woman's health where they thought it would be BURIED.
The paper ended up in the 1963 issue of Surgery, Gynecology & Obstetrics. The diea was so good, even in an an obscure journal which had no link to this work, the world realized its brilliance.
The device went on to save millions of lives and limbs.
Fogarty said it best: "An idea by itself has no importance whatsoever. It's the implementation of that idea and the acceptance by others that bring true benefit to our patients." Dr. Tom Fogarty passed away in December 2025 at 91. His life is filled with many lessons (more coming soon). But those four rejections are a clear reminder that some of medicine's greatest contributions started with rejection.
I always teach my tribe, embrace the suck, you might be shocked where it takes you. I learned to embrace rejection because I know my enemies better than they know me.
Today's lesson on the unfurling of life to gain time back is a big one. Someone reject it, but the idea buried with in it astounding and threatening to the paradigm in power. Read it, and understand how the modern Phillip Handler'a are in the world controlling science for the paradigm in power
threadreaderapp.com/thread/2037158…
Modern centralized medicine under the power of the Flexner Report has reached the pinnacle of success. Just about everyone who uses it is sick. This makes them the perfect customer. You need a TIME STEALING ROCKEFELLER OR ROTHSCHILD COMPANY draining you for life.
It was rejected last week while I was at the beach. Some would think this bother's Uncle Jack, but that might have been true in my younger years. It does not bother me now. I understand how PhDs, centralized MDs, and industrial healthcare have stolen the scientific process for profit and TIME THEFT.
Why am I not angry about this rejection? I understand the history of how the casino and your prisson was built.
An effective decentralized leader is able to make the first move to regain freedom, and they are able to cast a vision. Without vision, there will be no one to lead, and without anyone to lead, there is no decentralization in civilization.
Centralized medical systems will not go quiet into the decentralized night. Any power structure, regardless of initial purpose, will ultimately view retention of power as its primary goal. It's no surprise that those endowed with power find it difficult to hand over to a structure they don't control.
Because publishing was hijacked by Rockefeller's army of paid off players and in the 1960s it became not just about writing a good paper. It's about surviving the cycle: Paradigm rejection -> costly revision due to the Maxwell middlemen editors paid off -> resubmission often times over and over again to generate profits to run Ghalaine and Epstein's goals of their masters to perform TIME theft on humanity for the overseerers power & profit.
Where was the lesson born for me?
The Noble Prize was controlled by Rockefeller and Rothschild's interests and in 1905 the paradigm of energy was threatened by someone outside the matrix when he published 4 papers. The power players noted immediately they could not allow a science with immense power to change humanity to run free and saoveriegn until it could be controlled and monetized. The paradigm created a situation in banking and science to slow down progress. It included WW1, a bad treaty, and an installed puppet in Gemrany to run something called the Transfer Agreement.
This bought the paradigm controlling science TIME to figure out a solution. Their Fabian partners in AMerica hired an PhD to prove Einstein wrong and discredit him to stall the unfurling of his decentralized insights. They failed. Milliken wound up proving Einstein's photoelectric effect was true. In fact it was a universal physical law of Nature. It lead to E=mc^2 and a challenge to the global energy markets and the banking cartel that propped it all up.
In those 17 years a plan was installed to get countries into another war where this science could be used by the paradigm in power to control how it was used by humanity. What did Nobel, Rockefeller, and the Rothschilds accomplish?
Milliken got his Nobel Prize for trying to prove Einstein wrong before Einstein got his award. In that time delay, the Robber Barrons of TIME re- gained control of science to profit from it.
History reveals this lesson in theft.
So my recent rejection is not unexpected.
If you think this story is rare let me introduce you to medical student Thomas Fogarty.
He was another example of how the paradigm in power controlled a narrative by burying the truth for a period of time to get in front of a trend to profit from it. Fogarty publishing experience is another extraordinary examples of how PhDs help captains of industry steal TIME to obscure the truth from going free.
Savages should know their history
Dr. Tom Fogarty, one of medicine's pioneers in the minimally invasive era. He wrote a paper as a medical student about a device he built from a urethral catheter and a surgical glove, which became the balloon embolectomy catheter.
When he submitted the paper:
Annals of Surgery said no.
Surgery said no.
Archives of Surgery said no.
JAMA said no.
Each Jpournal editor was controlled by a gy named Phillip Handler who worked for Rockefeller's bio tech wing run out of Room 5600 in Rockerfeller Center in the 1950's -1960s.
IYKYK.
Todays' current day liar PhDs will never admit to this larceny because they have evolved to lie to you today.
They will tell you the science it too unconventional
Too far outside accepted practice.
the reality is the elite needed to gain control to profit from it and Handler's many PhDs did just that by rejecting Fogarty's work and making it show up in a journal for woman's health where they thought it would be BURIED.
The paper ended up in the 1963 issue of Surgery, Gynecology & Obstetrics. The diea was so good, even in an an obscure journal which had no link to this work, the world realized its brilliance.
The device went on to save millions of lives and limbs.
Fogarty said it best: "An idea by itself has no importance whatsoever. It's the implementation of that idea and the acceptance by others that bring true benefit to our patients." Dr. Tom Fogarty passed away in December 2025 at 91. His life is filled with many lessons (more coming soon). But those four rejections are a clear reminder that some of medicine's greatest contributions started with rejection.
I always teach my tribe, embrace the suck, you might be shocked where it takes you. I learned to embrace rejection because I know my enemies better than they know me.
Today's lesson on the unfurling of life to gain time back is a big one. Someone reject it, but the idea buried with in it astounding and threatening to the paradigm in power. Read it, and understand how the modern Phillip Handler'a are in the world controlling science for the paradigm in power
threadreaderapp.com/thread/2037158…
Modern centralized medicine under the power of the Flexner Report has reached the pinnacle of success. Just about everyone who uses it is sick. This makes them the perfect customer. You need a TIME STEALING ROCKEFELLER OR ROTHSCHILD COMPANY draining you for life.
2. Why should you shun Sinclair, Huberman, Means, Attia, Alo, Lufkin, Fauci, and much of MedTwitter? Because of this picture.
3. When dueterium leakage occurs into the matrix it stimulates cataplerosis in the TCA and the M1 Phenotype results.
This process leads directly to the CDR too because tunneling speeds are destroyed. Quantum mechanics tells us according to the formula for tunneling, even a tiny increase in distance (measured in angstroms) leads to an exponential drop in energy efficiency and a massive spike in ROS = massive non coherent UPEs that are the hallmark of disease generation.
This is why I showed you Picard picture on the change in IMJ geometry. When the IMJs change you know tunneling speeds have cratered.
Deuterium's KIE is a massive problem for tunneling speeds. But you and your food guru friends have no idea why. Quantum tunneling is extremely sensitive to mass. Deuteriumhas double the mass of H+. In the quantum world, as scale shrinks the effects become logrithmic because of the inverse square law. This means the effect of deuterium is off the chart. The doubling the mass of the particle attempting to "tunnel" across a gap doesn't just slow it down, it makes the probability of a successful tunnel drop exponentially.
This is not subject to your beliefs or your experts beliefs because these UNIVERSAL laws in physics true on Earth or another galaxy.
This process leads directly to the CDR too because tunneling speeds are destroyed. Quantum mechanics tells us according to the formula for tunneling, even a tiny increase in distance (measured in angstroms) leads to an exponential drop in energy efficiency and a massive spike in ROS = massive non coherent UPEs that are the hallmark of disease generation.
This is why I showed you Picard picture on the change in IMJ geometry. When the IMJs change you know tunneling speeds have cratered.
Deuterium's KIE is a massive problem for tunneling speeds. But you and your food guru friends have no idea why. Quantum tunneling is extremely sensitive to mass. Deuteriumhas double the mass of H+. In the quantum world, as scale shrinks the effects become logrithmic because of the inverse square law. This means the effect of deuterium is off the chart. The doubling the mass of the particle attempting to "tunnel" across a gap doesn't just slow it down, it makes the probability of a successful tunnel drop exponentially.
This is not subject to your beliefs or your experts beliefs because these UNIVERSAL laws in physics true on Earth or another galaxy.
Roger Froikin @rlefraim wrote, "Jews have two major New Year celebrations.
Most do not know or do not remember.
But one major New Year celebration, at the end of summer and beginning of cooling weather, is Rosh HaShana.
1)
Most do not know or do not remember.
But one major New Year celebration, at the end of summer and beginning of cooling weather, is Rosh HaShana.
1)
Rosh HaShana was a general celebration of the new year in Mesopotamia, recognized until Roman Empire influence by all Semitic peoples.
But Torah teaches that we have a second New Year celebration in the spring, in Nisan—Passover—when we Jews became a nation.
2)
But Torah teaches that we have a second New Year celebration in the spring, in Nisan—Passover—when we Jews became a nation.
2)
This year, for the 3,360th or so time, we celebrate becoming a nation on the night of the full moon, the night of the 14th of Nisan—the night where the moon washes the flat land of Eastern Egypt and the Sinai in light, and our people were on the move—not just to freedom,
3)
3)
